Fit
to Referee
One of the topics of discussion among
referees, and non-referees too when they are unhappy, is
what it takes to be a referee.
The qualities you need
You can imagine some of the qualities
needed, like knowledge of football and the Laws and
the ability to apply them, ‘man management’
skills plus things like love of the game, commitment,
enthusiasm, honesty and so on. The list seems endless and it’s little wonder the referees
we have are not perfect.
Nowadays especially a pretty thick skin helps as
well, expressed more elegantly as the ability to take
criticism even when it is unwarranted . . . .
. . . and physical fitness?
I have left one of the crucial
attributes out till now because it didn’t used to be as
important as it is today – physical fitness.
Referees have always needed eagle-eyes and good,
selective hearing, but in the days of referees in blazers,
bow ties and knee length shorts and clodhopper boots all
round, there wasn’t the same urgency about the game.
Today, because of the higher standards
of training and greater athleticism of the players and the
often frenetic speed of the game in the upper echelons,
especially the English game, referees and assistant referees
have to reach levels of fitness way above those of
yesteryear. Good
positioning is essential for good decision-making and that
depends on the officials fitness coupled with the ability to
‘read the game’ – to know where the best position will
be.
The issue of referee fitness has been
brought sharply into focus in the last few days by the
removal of Gary Wilard, one of our well-known FIFA referees
from the referees’ list.
He has apparently failed his third attempt to reach
the required standard.
What referees have to do
At FIFA and at Premiership level
referees have to undertake a modified form of the ‘Cooper
test’ which is based on timed runs.
Two 50 metre runs, each to be completed in under 7
seconds; two 200m metre runs, each in less than 32 seconds;
a continuous 12 minute run with a minimum distance covered
of 2,700 metres. For
referees under 35 years of age the expected distance is
about 3,000 metres. A similar test is used for
semi-professional and senior amateur football - the
contributory and feeder leagues. However, Premiership
referees also have regular fitness examinations where heart
and lung function in particular are monitored.
In the Football League they use the
‘bleep’ tests - 20 metre ‘shuttle’ runs which
involve turning and sprinting against the clock and
which correspond very well to the demands of
refereeing, where short sprints, turns and stamina are the
main fitness requirements.
At the grass-roots level
Of course, the majority of referees
officiate at local level and they have no more than a
rudimentary eye test as part of their qualification process.
There is no doubt that the game on the
parks is played by many who themselves are less than
ultra-fit and the demands on the official are not of
Premiership standard. It
is often argued – and there is evidence – that the
system works in a natural way.
Only the fitter officials get promotion and
appointment to the higher level of games where the standard
of fitness required is higher
Nevertheless, neither players nor spectators can have
much confidence in a referee or assistant who is 30 yards
behind play and puffing to catch up.
So what do we do?
The solution?
Ideally, continue to introduce physical tests down
the pyramid of leagues until the local leagues are included.
But there are difficulties.
Not only would we lose a lot of referees, we would
also discourage many more from taking up the whistle.
And the logistics of arranging the testing are pretty
horrific.
Meantime we encourage our referees not
to referee to be fit, but to be fit to referee.
And we have to take a bit of comfort from the fact
that some of our best local referees are not necessarily the
fittest – they just have the other qualities in greater
measure.
Brian Palmer
© B. Palmer 1998
Back To Contents
|