Nearness to play means better decisions

A couple of weeks ago I ran the line at a cup final. As the three of us walked back to our dressing room, we agreed what a good game it had been and the referee remarked that it was pleasing nothing controversial had marred the day. Not that many games overall end in controversy but we knew what he meant. 

Cup ties and finals in particular are special because they are one-offs and the losing team doesn't live to fight another day. That is of course unlike league matches where a bad result can be offset by victories in the future. Nevertheless, no referee likes to feel that somehow he has influenced the result of any game, which by one side at least may seem to be unfair. 

That's why the referee of the Reading v Norwich match, Neale Barry, made an apology after the game to the Royals management and supporters for inadvertently blocking the clearance by Reading's Dean Gordon, which meant the ball fell to the feet of Norwich substitute Phil Mulryne to score the only goal of the game. 

A friend of mine who watches from the East Stand said that spectators there were calling for a dropped ball. Although the incident seemed unfair, that just couldn't happen. The referee is what we call an appurtenance of the game, just like goalposts or comer flagposts, if the ball bounces off any of them and remains in play, you just carry on. 

Reading manager Steve Coppell said that the referee shouldn't have been there but you can't have it both ways. It is impressed on all referees that they should keep up with play. I mentioned last week that as referees progress up through the leagues each fitness test gets harder. Premiership referees are also tested regularly throughout the season and today are super fit. They need to be to keep up with the pace that the game is now played at.

Recent research at a Premiership match plotted the movement of players and officials during the game. The most ground covered by any player that day was nine kilometres whilst the referee travelled fifteen kilometres. But fitness isn't just an end in itself, the other key factor is positioning. In my role of mentor, I go to a match for the sole purpose of watching the referee and one thing I find that most new referees have to learn is positioning. 

The late Sir Stanley Rous devised the diagonal system of refereeing which means that the referee runs a diagonal from corner flagpost to corner flagpost, always trying to keep the ball between him and one of the assistant referees. 

Today's referees talk about patrol paths but it is much the same idea, although they deviate from the strict diagonal, to get closer to play. The reason for this is simply that being nearer to play enables a referee to make better decisions. The ideal position to be able to see offences is said to be about fifteen yards away, looking in at the action. Neale Barry said that this was the first time such an incident had happened to him in thirty one years as a referee. I think this is a pretty good record, for every referee gets in the way sometime, as players are not always predictable in their actions. 

Neale Barry was booed off at the end of the Norwich game and some fans may still see his unintentional intervention as a key point if Reading fail to reach the play-offs this season but, although it affected the outcome of that particular match, it can't be the reason for their final league position. As I say, referees don't want to be controversial but this doesn't mean that they should shy away from taking decisions, or from trying to be in the best positions to make them. 

Dick Sawdon Smith

 

Back To Contents

 

© R Sawdon Smith 2004